RECENTLY OUR PRESIDENT and Petaling Jaya City Councillor Anthony SB Thanasayan issued a blistering attack at the All Petaling Jaya Jaya Residents Association Coalition or APAC for refusing to take action against a member of its subcommittee Miss Bathmavathi Krishnan for trying to disrupt a disability seminar organised by MBPJ. Click HERE.
Recently, PET+BLOGSPOT received a letter from a long-time resident of Petaling Jaya who not only took Krishnan's action to task but also seriously questions the very role and existence of APAC.
We decided to print the author's letter in full today in PET+BLOGSPOT:
I have been a faithful resident of Petaling Jaya and I have seen this satellite grow from an industrial estate to a thriving cosmopolitan township.
Today, I am disappointed that Petaling Jaya is lagging behind in terms of modern infrastructure, deplorable and decaying conditions of our buildings due to lack of proper maintenance, poor transportation systems and congestion in every part of the city.
As an elderly person, I write in response to the residents and against APAC who are against development, especially in Section 52, Petaling Jaya.
In my personal opinion, this group who calls themselves APAC, did not approach us to seek our opinion on Section 52.
How then can they object when the majority of us residents were not consulted?
Who then is APAC to seek publicity by issuing false statements and baseless remarks claiming to represent “the whole of Petaling Jaya”.
In my research, I find APAC to be just a small group of “wealthy individuals” trying to exert authority over the Petaling Jaya City Council and simply objecting for the sake of objecting.
I personally feel APAC is abusing the priviledge accorded to residents’ associations by the local council and I call upon the Dato’ Bandar of Petaling Jaya to ignore this selfish group.
Petaling Jaya would be a better place without any contributions from APAC.
Who is APAC? What does APAC stand for?
The majority of us in PJ are not members of APAC. So, why claim to represent the whole of Petaling Jaya knowing this statement is false and misleading?
APAC has a representative in Miss Bathmavathi Krishnan.
What contributions has she made for the well-being of the OKU community in Petaling Jaya?
Some of us were very disappointed when we heard she gatecrashed a seminar organized by MBPJ and together with her comrades came to disrupt the sessions.
A very shameful and disgraceful act by someone on a wheelchair! Was this supported by APAC?
APAC has not made any contributions towards the well-being of an elderly like me and they have not put forward any suggestions to the Petaling Jaya City Council to uplift and upgrade the amenities and facilities especially for the elderly, handicapped, blind, wheelchair users and the disabled.
Just because most of them are abled bodies, the disabled are ignored and forgotten.
I am certain what PJ really needs to move forward can be materialized through the proposed development at Section 52 as it adopts a development model that will provide for the elderly, handicapped and the disabled community through the deployment of ramps for wheelchairs, uniquely designed walkways for the blind, ample reserved disabled parking lots as well as lifts, telephone booths and restrooms specially equipped for this community.
I am also especially reassured that the development will be deploying the services of auxiliary police for basic security measures embedded within the development model.
This is indeed a thoughtful, responsible and strategic approach taken by the developer in helping to preserve the community’s peace and safety.
While, nothing has been carved in stone with regards to improvement of the traffic situation but at this point I am pleased that thought and effort has been given to take the necessary steps through traffic assessments and plans to improve traffic congestion as well as provide better public transportation for the betterment of PJ folks.
Needless to say I was also happy to read that the cost to upgrade and improve traffic conditions will not be from us, tax payers.
At my age and as someone who appreciates greenery and nature also considering the lack of it in cities such as PJ & KL, it was such great news to me when I learned that the development will also have a vast park and playground that not only caters for normal children but special ones too.
What is more fascinating is that the development will adopt a “green concept” - energy savings and for a sustainable building concept to reduce impact on the environment.
In my lifetime, I never thought that Petaling Jaya will see such development that is on par with world class developments.
My hope is that this development will materialize soon and I urge more and more Malaysians to support it as it will not only raise the property value in PJ but will benefit the whole Petaling Jaya. Well done to MBPJ and its councillors and Kudos to the State Government of Selangor for supporting development in Petaling Jaya.
A Resident of P.Jaya.
PET+BLOGSPOT is the ONLINE BLOG of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association or Petpositive. Our stories are CURRENT, ACCURATE and RELIABLE. We offer both local and foreign news on animals, disability and the elderly. PET+BLOGSPOT was first established in October 2007. Our hits since then are now 100,000 and ever increasing! PET+BLOGSPOT is updated daily. Kindly note that views expressed in this PET+BLOGSPOT are not necessarily those of PETPOSITIVE. You may also visit our Webpage by browsing: www.petpositive.com.my You can also find us in Facebook under PETPOSITIVE EMPOWERMENT. Please sign up as a FOLLOWER of this Blog if you haven't done so already in order to show us your kind support for our work. Thank you!