16 May 2013
Last updated at 03:26 GMT
Campaigners say existing laws on dangerous dogs are not working properly
Plans to make it a criminal offence in England and Wales to allow a dog to be dangerously out of control in a private property have been welcomed by the Commons environment committee.
But it criticised a lack of action to address threatening behaviour at an early stage and reduce risk of attacks.
More than 200,000 people are attacked by dogs in England every year.
Campaigners say legislation dating back to 1991 has been ineffective in dealing with aggressive animals.
Current laws cover only attacks by dogs in public places and private areas where animals are prohibited from being, such as a neighbour's garden.
Ministers want to extend the scope of the law to enable a prosecution to be brought against anyone whose dog injures someone or acts aggressively in a private place where they are permitted to be, such as a home.
New dangerous dogs laws do not go far enough, say MPs
Campaigners say existing laws on dangerous dogs are not working properly
Tougher laws to tackle the threat of dangerous dogs and irresponsible owners do not go far enough, MPs have said.
Plans to make it a criminal offence in England and Wales to allow a dog to be dangerously out of control in a private property have been welcomed by the Commons environment committee.
But it criticised a lack of action to address threatening behaviour at an early stage and reduce risk of attacks.
More than 200,000 people are attacked by dogs in England every year.
Campaigners say legislation dating back to 1991 has been ineffective in dealing with aggressive animals.
Current laws cover only attacks by dogs in public places and private areas where animals are prohibited from being, such as a neighbour's garden.
Ministers want to extend the scope of the law to enable a prosecution to be brought against anyone whose dog injures someone or acts aggressively in a private place where they are permitted to be, such as a home.
'Reasonable precautions'
There have been eight fatal attacks in private residences since 2007, most recently in March, when teenager Jade Anderson was mauled to death in Wigan when she visited a friend's house.
Police currently have no plans to prosecute anyone in relation to her death, saying there is no evidence a crime has been committed and that they are bound by the law.
The government's plans would also criminalise attacks on assistance dogs while exempting homeowners from prosecution in the event of an attack on a trespasser.
However, the MPs called for clarification as to whether they would apply in cases where someone had
trespassed with "innocent intentions" - such as a child recovering a ball from a neighbour's garden.
The committee also expressed concerns about how incidents on surrounding land, such as gardens or paths, and outside dwellings such as sheds would be treated in law.
It said the courts should be allowed to take into account the actions of responsible homeowners who took "reasonable precautions" to stop their animals from causing harm, such as putting up warnings outside properties and securing fences, as opposed to those behaving "negligently".
There have been eight fatal attacks in private residences since 2007, most recently in March, when teenager Jade Anderson was mauled to death in Wigan when she visited a friend's house.
Police currently have no plans to prosecute anyone in relation to her death, saying there is no evidence a crime has been committed and that they are bound by the law.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote
Government spokesmanOur anti-social behaviour reforms will give the police and local agencies more effective powers to deal with owners who fail to take responsibility for their dogs”
The cross-party committee said
existing laws had "comprehensively failed" to deal with the threat from
dangerous dogs and welcomed the proposed extension - which could also
see maximum penalties increased from a six-month jail sentence to two
years.
The government's plans would also criminalise attacks on assistance dogs while exempting homeowners from prosecution in the event of an attack on a trespasser.
However, the MPs called for clarification as to whether they would apply in cases where someone had
trespassed with "innocent intentions" - such as a child recovering a ball from a neighbour's garden.
The committee also expressed concerns about how incidents on surrounding land, such as gardens or paths, and outside dwellings such as sheds would be treated in law.
It said the courts should be allowed to take into account the actions of responsible homeowners who took "reasonable precautions" to stop their animals from causing harm, such as putting up warnings outside properties and securing fences, as opposed to those behaving "negligently".
'Tailored powers'
The committee also said homeowners "needed assurance" that
they would be protected in the event of attacks on trespassers when they
were not at home.
It was the police's view, the MPs said, that the public felt a dog left on its own had a role in protecting the property and this should form the basis of a legal defence when attacks occurred during owners' absence.
On the issue of preventing future attacks, the committee said there was a lack of pre-emptive action and the proposals would actually limit current council powers to stop animals from entering certain areas.
It is calling on ministers to reconsider the case for Dog Control Notices - introduced in Scotland in 2011 - which give local authorities powers to tackle all aspects of dog-related crime such as illegal breeding and the ownership and training of so-called "status dogs".
It was the police's view, the MPs said, that the public felt a dog left on its own had a role in protecting the property and this should form the basis of a legal defence when attacks occurred during owners' absence.
On the issue of preventing future attacks, the committee said there was a lack of pre-emptive action and the proposals would actually limit current council powers to stop animals from entering certain areas.
It is calling on ministers to reconsider the case for Dog Control Notices - introduced in Scotland in 2011 - which give local authorities powers to tackle all aspects of dog-related crime such as illegal breeding and the ownership and training of so-called "status dogs".
'Hasty legislation'
The committee argues that ministers must "provide law enforcers with tailored powers to tackle aggressive dogs before they injure people and other animals".
Other recommendations include licensing for dog breeders producing a minimum of two litters - as opposed to five now - and a code of practice covering online sales of animals.
The British Veterinary Association echoed the MPs' concerns that the proposals "did not go far enough".
"Instead of making more mistakes with hastily made legislation we are asking the government to think again and reconsider introducing Dog Control Notices," its president Peter Jones said, suggesting they had the support of dog welfare organisations and "many parliamentarians" as well as veterinary surgeons,
A government spokesman said it was taking "urgent action" to protect the public from dangerous dogs.
"We are changing the law so that owners can be prosecuted for dog attacks on private property and our anti-social behaviour reforms will give the police and local agencies more effective powers to deal with owners who fail to take responsibility for their dogs."
The committee argues that ministers must "provide law enforcers with tailored powers to tackle aggressive dogs before they injure people and other animals".
Other recommendations include licensing for dog breeders producing a minimum of two litters - as opposed to five now - and a code of practice covering online sales of animals.
The British Veterinary Association echoed the MPs' concerns that the proposals "did not go far enough".
"Instead of making more mistakes with hastily made legislation we are asking the government to think again and reconsider introducing Dog Control Notices," its president Peter Jones said, suggesting they had the support of dog welfare organisations and "many parliamentarians" as well as veterinary surgeons,
A government spokesman said it was taking "urgent action" to protect the public from dangerous dogs.
"We are changing the law so that owners can be prosecuted for dog attacks on private property and our anti-social behaviour reforms will give the police and local agencies more effective powers to deal with owners who fail to take responsibility for their dogs."
PET+BLOGSPOT is the ONLINE BLOG of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association or Petpositive. Our stories are CURRENT, ACCURATE and RELIABLE. We offer both local and foreign news on animals, disability and the elderly. PET+BLOGSPOT was first established in October 2007. Our hits since then are now 150,000 and ever increasing! PET+BLOGSPOT is updated daily. Kindly note that views expressed in PET+BLOGSPOT are not necessarily those of PETPOSITIVE. You may also visit our Webpage by browsing: www.petpositive.com.my You can also find us in Facebook under PETPOSITIVE EMPOWERMENT. Please sign up as a FOLLOWER of this Blog if you haven't done so already in order to show us your kind support for our work. Thank you!
