Showing posts with label Whaling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Whaling. Show all posts

Sunday, August 29, 2010

NGOs Warn Of Contaminated Whale Meat


 
Anti-whaling NGOs warn of 'contaminated' whale meat
Pilot whale hunt in the Faroe Islands Pilot whale hunting in the Faroe Islands has been going on for generations

Environmental and animal-welfare groups are urging the International Whaling Commission (IWC) to persuade the World Health Organization (WHO) to act over fears about eating whale meat.

The coalition of organisations wants the WHO to issue guidelines amid fears about the safety of the meat.
The groups say whale meat is highly contaminated with mercury and should not be eaten.

But whaling nations say they already have health guidelines in place.

For the past weeks, anti-whaling activists have been drafting a letter aimed at persuading governments to act, in particular, trying to draw attention to the issue of consuming meat of smaller whales and dolphins, known as small cetaceans.

They say dangerously high levels of mercury accumulate up the food chain.
Small cetaceans, like tooth whales and pilot whales, are near the top of it and therefore a lot more toxic compounds tend to accumulate in these mammals' tissues than in smaller inhabitants of the marine world, warn the NGOs.

Currently, the WHO does not have any guidelines regarding the consumption of whale meat, but its website does list mercury as one of the top 10 chemicals of major public health concern.

The groups are hoping that their efforts will prompt the WHO to issue such advice in the near future.
Risks and benefits But the government of one of the nations that consumes a lot of small cetaceans' meat and blubber, the Faroe Islands in the North-East Atlantic, a self-governing nation within the Kingdom of
Denmark, says that the people have been advised on the maximum amount deemed safe for the health - no more than one-to-two meals per month.

"It's quite wrong to use the term 'health hazard'," Kate Sanderson, director of the department of oceans and environment of Faroes' Ministry of Foreign Affairs, told BBC News.
Humpback whales Only a fraction of all whales is protected by the IWC whaling ban

"It's true that pilot whales have very high levels of mercury in the meat and PCBs in the blubber and in 1998, the relevant health authorities at the Faroes issued a safety recommendation advising people on how much it was safe to eat. And people have taken that advice on board."

She also said that eating whale meat and blubber presented numerous, well-documented, benefits for humans.
But conservationists believe that harmful effects of mercury outweigh all the benefits.

They also hope that if the WHO manages to raise people's interest about possible health risks of whale meat, further goals of limiting the hunt of small cetaceans may be achieved.

The current IWC whaling moratorium covers only some 10 whale species - a relatively small fraction of the total number of about 80 species in the whale family.

Hunting to extinction? "The IWC ban on commercial whaling of larger species does not extend to small hunted species like pilot whales and dolphins, which are being hunted in huge numbers," Andy Ottaway of the Campaign Whale, a UK-based NGO, told BBC News.

He said that if the practice continued, it was possible to hunt small cetaceans to extinction.
Puffins Faroe Islands are known for their natural beauty
"A lot of hunting of smaller whales and dolphins is seen by those countries that conduct the whaling as outside the jurisdiction of the convention, which is a total nonsense.

"In some circumstances, they are being hunted in greater numbers because of the whaling ban for larger species," he said.

He explained that his organisation, along with several other groups, has already received support regarding the public health risks issue from 12 governments.

They are hoping to get others to back the efforts to limit the consumption of small whales and thus limit the hunts.

Probably the biggest annual hunt of small cetaceans takes place off the coast of Japan, which has received world-wide attention after the airing of the 2009 Oscar-winning documentary, The Cove.

In it, the film-makers show how entire social units of some 20,000 to 25,000 pilot whales and dolphins are annually lured into shallow waters and then killed, turning the sea bright red.

The whale drive in the Faroe Islands has also recently been in the spotlight because of gruesome photos, circulated on the internet by anti-whaling campaigners.

The images show pilot whales, among them females with cut-out foetuses, lying on a blood-soaked shore.
This summer's annual hunt at the Faroes ended with the death of almost 700 animals.

But the nation's authorities argue that the way of killing the whales by forcing them with motor boats to swim towards the shore and then killing them with knives is strictly regulated and monitored by local veterinarians.
Islanders cut the whales' spinal cord with a knife, thus also severing the major blood supply to the brain and "ensuring both the loss of consciousness and death within seconds".

Economic value Ms Sanderson said the current estimated population of pilot whales in the North Atlantic was about 700,000, and even if up to 3,000 animals were killed annually, it would be within a sustainable limit.
She also said that the hunt was important to satisfy the local population's food needs.
An image of a whaing hunt Whaling has been going on for centuries
"If we don't have the whale meat and the blubber, what do we eat instead? We don't have meat production as such in the Faroes other than sheep and a limited amount of cattle that is kept mostly for milk. The sheep population is certainly not enough to serve the meat needs.

"Pilot whales represent not only the traditional part of the diet that people value very much, but also something that's free. It doesn't have to be paid for as an import.

"So it has that economic value as well because you would have to look at what would be the cost of replacing it with imported meat."

But animal activists call the tradition, which goes back several centuries, cruel and the killings unnecessary.

"The Faroes is a fairly wealthy country, and the tradition, if that's what they want to call it, seems to be continuing just for tradition's sake, rather than for any need for whale products," said Mr Ottaway.

"It seems that [this year] they killed so many animals in quick succession, that they can't possibly utilise all the products," he added.

But Ms Sanderson said that there was no doubt all the whales would be eaten.

'Unacceptable' Mark Simmonds of the Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society told BBC News that besides meat consumption being a threat to people's health, killing small whales with the methods used and in such proximity of the UK coast was "simply unacceptable" for many Europeans.

He added that the Faroes were probably able to continue with the practice mostly because they were not part of the EU, even though Denmark was.
A whale burger Whale meat is sold in many countries
"But still, the Faroe Islands are only about 200 miles off the Scottish coast. It's a lovely place and they are certainly seeking ecotourism in a big way, presenting themselves to the world as a very green and attractive place to go to. But that seems to clash somehow with the on-going enthusiasm for whaling."

He said that to address the issue, it was important to understand why the local population kept on with the centuries-old tradition of the whale hunt.

"To so many of us in the countries that are sitting next door it just seems totally unacceptable. It is very clear that this form of hunting is incredibly cruel. There is no way it would be accepted in the British Isles, it would be against the law for conservation and welfare aspects.

"Killing the animals that come to those waters to breed, killing the youngsters and the pregnant mothers - and this all happens within sight of each other. These are intelligent animals, they are fully aware of what's going on around them," he stressed.

Hunting in general But Ms Sanderson said that killing pilot whales was no worse than slaughtering any other animals, and that the local authorities were always trying to monitor the hunt and "improve the things".

"It's not entirely controlled circumstances, obviously, but if you can ethically accept hunting of wild animals at all, than you have to accept that in some circumstances things don't always go according to plan.

"Red deer in Scotland - are they all shot? Some are shot and wounded and they run off into the forest and it takes hours for them to die.

"That never happens at the whale hunt in the Faroes. They may take a couple of minutes to die, but certainly not hours, like hunted animals in other form of hunting can."

Though the conservationists think it is rather unlikely for the IWC to extend the whaling ban to cover the small cetaceans, many hope that getting people to think about their health will do the trick.

More on This Story

Related stories

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external Internet sites


PET+BLOGSPOT is an ACTIVE ONLINE BLOG of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association (Petpositive). We strive to keep our reports and stories CURRENT, ACCURATE and RELIABLE. We offer both local and foreign news on animals, disability and the elderly. PET+BLOGSPOT was first established in October 2007. Our hits since then is now 55,000 and counting. PET+BLOGSPOT is updated daily. Sometimes even twice and three times a day. Kindly take note that views expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of PETPOSITIVE. You may also visit our Webpage by browsing: www.petpositive.com.my You can also find us in Facebook as PETPOSITIVE EMPOWERMENT. Thank you for your support.

Friday, May 28, 2010

Australia to mount legal bid against Japan whaling - bbc online

Page last updated at 7:28 GMT, Friday, 28 May 2010 8:28 UK
Japanese whaling ship hauls two minke whales on board (file 
image) Japan says its whale hunt is legal under the international convention

Australia has said it will begin legal action against Japan over its whaling in the Antarctic.
It will argue that the annual whaling hunt in the Southern Ocean is in violation of an international ban on commercial whaling.
Japan, which kills hundreds of whales ever year, says the hunt is carried out for scientific research purposes.
Critics say this is a cover for commercial whaling and that whale meat not used in research is sold for food.
The Australian government says it will lodge formal proceedings at the International Court of Justice in The Hague next week.
The move comes ahead of a meeting of the International Whaling Commission (IWC) in Morocco next month, where agreement is being sought on a new approach to whaling, which would allow commercial hunting but with strict quotas.
Australian Environment Minister Peter Garrett and Attorney General Robert McClelland said in a joint statement that the move underlines their "commitment to bring to an end Japan's program of so-called scientific whaling".
'Disappointing' There has been a ban on commercial whaling for 25 years, but a Japanese whaling fleet heads to the Southern Ocean each southern summer to harpoon hundreds of whales as part of what it calls lethal research, which is allowed.
Australia had tried to negotiate an end to these forays and had given Japan until November to stop this form of whaling. It then brought forward its plans to take the matter to court.

THE LEGALITIES OF WHALING

  • Objection - A country formally objects to the IWC moratorium, declaring itself exempt. Example: Norway
  • Scientific - A nation issues unilateral 'scientific permits'; any IWC member can do this. Example: Japan
  • Aboriginal - IWC grants permits to indigenous groups for subsistence food. Example: Alaskan Inupiat
Culture clash over Japan whaling Whales - 'resource' or 'right'?
Conservationists have broadly welcomed the legal action, praising the government of Prime Minster Kevin Rudd for standing up to Japan.
But the BBC's Sydney correspondent Nick Bryant says that the Australian Greens have said it is essentially a political move from a prime minister, who has been slipping in the polls, to make good on a election promise made three years ago.
Japan is Australia's second biggest trading partner, and Canberra says it hopes the move will not damage their friendly relations.
The Japanese fisheries ministry has described the legal action as "very disappointing".
"We will continue to explain that the scientific whaling that we are conducting is lawful in accordance with article eight of the international convention for the regulation of whaling," said the ministry's deputy press secretary Hidenobu Sobashima.
Mr Sobashima said the issue "shouldn't jeopardise the overall good relations between Japan and Australia".
The Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith said the two countries have agreed to treat the matter as "an independent legal arbitration of a disagreement between friends".


PET+BLOGSPOT is the official online blog of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association (Petpositive). Our contents are ACCURATE, RELIABLE and THE LATEST. We offer both local and foreign news on animals, disability and the elderly. PET+BLOGSPOT was first established in October 2007. Our hits since then is 40,000 hits and counting. PET+BLOGSPOT is updated daily. Kindly take note that views expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of PETPOSITIVE. You may also visit our Webpage by browsing: www.petpositive.com.my

Friday, April 16, 2010

Peace Plan For Whaling To Go Forward This Year - bbc online

Whaling peace plan to go forward this year

By Richard Black
Environment correspondent, BBC News

Minke whale
Proponents of the deal say it would mean fewer whales being killed
A proposal aimed at bridging the split between whaling nations and their opponents will almost certainly come to governments for decision this year.
Sources say it could involve Japan accepting quotas below current levels; but Iceland is opposing proposed catch limits and an international trade ban.
Some anti-whaling countries see such a "peace package" as the only way to constrain whale hunting.
But others are likely to hold out for a complete end to the practice.
A small group of countries including the three active hunting nations - Iceland, Japan and Norway - and opponents such as New Zealand, Australia and Germany has been holding talks in Washington DC this week, exploring a possible compromise on quotas and other issues.
Following these talks, BBC News understands that a package is very likely to be finalised and lodged with the International Whaling Commission (IWC) by next Thursday - the deadline, under IWC rules, if it is to be debated at the June IWC meeting.
Saving whales is absolutely what we are about
Monica Medina
US commissioner to the IWC
As yet, the package contains no agreed quotas; the chairman, Chilean diplomat Cristian Maquieira, is to insert suggested numbers over the next few days.
Sources close to the talks say Japan appears prepared to contemplate scaling back its annual Antarctic hunt to a size that anti-whaling nations might find acceptable.
In return, it would expect to gain catch quotas in the North Pacific waters close to its shores, which would benefit coastal communities where whaling is still practiced.
At the time of writing, Japanese representatives could not be reached for comment.
Although commercial whaling was banned in 1982, Japan hunts under regulations permitting whaling for scientific research, while Iceland and Norway lodged formal objections to the moratorium and so mount openly commercial operations.
Targets for criticism
However, if agreement between Japan and its opponents appears possible following two years of preparatory talks, there appears little scope for compromise on Iceland's whaling.
"We have been showing good faith, but by presenting a moving target they are showing a lack of will to negotiate," said Iceland's IWC commissioner Tomas Heidar.
Whalemeat restaurant in Japan
Nordic nations hope to sell whalemeat into the Japanese market
"You cannot negotiate with a moving target," he told BBC News from Washington.
Last year, Icelandic boats caught 125 fin whales and 81 minkes - a significant increase on previous years, though still substantially below quotas in the years before 1982.
At a previous preparatory meeting, the anti-whaling side had proposed quotas of 60 fins and 60 minkes per year, Mr Heidar said.
Knowing these were not acceptable to Iceland, the anti-whaling bloc then lowered their offer still further, he related - subsequently adding the rider that under the new agreement, whales would have to be caught for local consumption only.
As Iceland's ambitions include exporting fin whale meat to Japan, this was absolutely not acceptable.
International trade in whalemeat is banned, but Iceland, Japan and Norway have registered exemptions to the UN wildlife trade convention for some whale species.
The importance of international trade has been demonstrated in recent weeks by the interception in a Dutch port of an Icelandic whalemeat consignment apparently destined for Japan, the disclosure of a small export from Iceland to Latvia, the closure of a Los Angeles restaurant that was selling whalemeat, and a DNA study claiming to show that at least some of the meat sold there and in South Korea came from Japan's scientific whaling programme.
Green splits
The "peace package" would set terms for the next 10 years, with a review after five.
Initial quotas could be amended downwards if scientific assessments indicated the necessity. Governments would agree not to set quotas unilaterally.
Whaling nations would have to agree to a monitoring regime involving observers on boats and a DNA register designed to keep illegal whalemeat out of the market.
THE LEGALITIES OF WHALING
Objection - A country formally objects to the IWC moratorium, declaring itself exempt. Example: Norway
Scientific - A nation issues unilateral 'scientific permits'; any IWC member can do this. Example: Japan
Aboriginal - IWC grants permits to indigenous groups for subsistence food. Example: Alaskan Inupiat
Whaling by indigenous groups would not be affected.
Environmental groups have been split on the "peace process".
Most are vehemently opposed in public, and have castigated anti-whaling governments for getting involved.
But those governments argue that simply demanding an end to whaling is not working, and compromise could be a better option.
"Saving whales is absolutely what we are about," said US IWC commissioner Monica Medina.
"But now we have a problem of increasing whaling, a black market and no controls.
"The US government couldn't be more opposed to lethal scientific whaling and commercial whaling."
But behind the scenes, some activists are prepared to endorse a compromise if it results in a significant and sustained cut in the numbers of whales killed each year.
Those moving the "peace process" are keen to find consensus at this year's IWC meeting in Morocco.
But it is not clear how the impasse between these countries and Iceland can be overcome.
Richard.Black-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk
PET+BLOGSPOT is the official online blog of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association (Petpositive).

Our contents are ACCURATE, RELIABLE and THE LATEST. We offer both local and foreign news on animals, disability and the elderly.

PET+BLOGSPOT was first established in October 2007. Our hits since then is 35,000 hits and counting.

PET+BLOGSPOT is updated daily.

Kindly take note that views expressed in this blog are not necessarily those of PETPOSITIVE.

You may also visit our Webpage by browsing: www.petpositive.com.my