Animal scientists’ debate on ethical animal use
Anthony SB Thanasayan
Anthony SB Thanasayan is a wheelchair user who is powered by
his service dogs who help him stay on top of life. He is president of
Malaysia's first and only animal-assisted therapy society called
Petpositive.
Anthony SB Thanasayan
Published: 17 November 2014
More than 320 delegates from as many as 22 countries participated at
the Asian Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations' (Aflas)
Congress last Monday.
The two-day event which was attended by nations across the Asian,
American and European continents – including Oceania – was held at a
leading hotel in Kuala Lumpur.
The occasion was the sixth of its kind which has taken place every two
years since its inception in early 2000 – with 10 laboratory animal
science associations from 10 member countries.
The ten nations are China, Chinese Taipei, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. In addition to promoting technical and education cooperation in the
field of laboratory animal science, animal welfare is a chief concern
for Aflas.
The 2014 Aflas Congress was officiated by Datuk Dr Mohamad Azmie b
Zakaria, the director-general (DG) of the Department of Veterinary
Services Malaysia. In his plenary speech, the DG spoke about the
regulatory control of animal use in Malaysia.
Other topics were delivered by eminent authorities in their respective
fields from animal welfare to various specialists in animal
experimentations.
One of the key highlights was a paper from Japan by the Japanese Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments.
They stressed that an international agreement of what is known as "the
three Rs" – replacement, reduction and refinement – in animal use is
something all nations cannot do without.
Speakers from the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation for
Laboratory Animal Care International covered topics stressing on how
vital proper regulation of animal use is in each country in order to
bring about good animal welfare practices and good science.
Other plenary sessions focused on how to make meaningful translations
of cancer research results from animals to humans, and the necessity of
“good laboratory practice" (GLP) in producing sound research.
Speaking to me after the congress, organising chairman and local
veterinarian Dr Goh Yong Meng said that based on feedback received from
the participants, the congress had mostly been an enlightening
experience for everyone.
"It became very evident that as scientists, we have to talk about and
keep our focus on the scientific facts and legislation of animal welfare
– rather than on the emotionally-driven romantic ideals in animal use,"
said Dr Goh, who also sits in the committee of the Laboratory Animal
Science Association of Malaysia.
"We hope that the recently concluded Aflas Congress 2014 will serve as a
strong catalyst not only to drive sound animal research in our country
and region; but more importantly, to highlight the urgency for the
Animal Welfare Act to be legislated in the near future in Malaysia.”
Dr Goh, who is also an associate professor in a local university, went
on to explain that the Aflas congress came about in response to the 1975
book by the Australian philosopher, Peter Singer called, "Animal
Liberation". The book challenges the rights of human beings to use
animals for any purpose.
That idea grew into the founding philosophical principle of animal
liberation movements that were against the use of animals in
experiments, integrating principles from an earlier book by British
researchers William Russell and Rex Burch in 1959 called, "The
Principles of Humane Experimental Technique".
According to Dr Goh, the book advocated the "three Rs" in animal experimentation.
This approach, he said, enabled animal welfare advocates and
researchers to find, and agree on a common solution towards responsible
animal use in advancing research.
"As a result, the membership of laypersons and/or animal welfare
advocates in Institutional Animal Care And Use Committees (IACUC) – a
special group officially set up in research/teaching institutions
globally – is a common sight which was made mandatory since 1980 in
Malaysia.
"The outcome has been mutually beneficial, as this movement moderates
working together towards finding scientifically valid alternatives to
animal use, to safe guarding animal welfare and to ensure responsible
use of animals."
Citing the Ebola scourge across the globe and a possible vaccine for
dengue in the home-front, Dr Goh, who is also a researcher in finding a
cure for diabetes among human beings, said that for the first time
scientists are being "forced to consider using drugs (on humans) that
are still in a development or experimental stage.
"The main reason why these drugs and vaccines are delayed is because
the regulating authorities want to ensure that the products' risks on
humans is at its minimum.
"Currently, the best approach is to conduct safety testing which almost
certainly uses animal models which is inevitable and mandatory for most
regulating agencies in the world, such as the US Food and Drug
Administration and the national Pharmaceutical Control Bureau in
Malaysia.
"While the debate is still on the necessity, morality and validity of
animal testing, every medicinal product and medical devices that we use
today would have undergone some degree of testing, in non-human species,
prior to human clinical trials.
"Therefore responsible animal use is a critical aim in regulating
animal use in institutions and organisations and institutions
with active animal model studies are required to set up an IACUC.
"Malaysia's Animal Welfare Bill (scheduled to come out early next year)
is currently drafting a law to regulate animal studies in research and
development.
"This is necessary not only to promote the growth of
biotechnology-based knowledge economy in the country, but also to
safeguard the nation from being used as an outsourcing ground for animal
tests that cannot be performed, or even deemed excessive in developed
countries," said Dr Goh. – November 17, 2014.
* This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and
does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.
- See more at:
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/opinion/anthony-sb-thanasayan/article/animal-scientists-debate-on-ethical-animal-use#sthash.fduVT2wu.dpuf
PET+BLOGSPOT is the ONLINE BLOG of the Malaysian Animal-Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and Elderly Association or Petpositive.
Our stories are CURRENT, ACCURATE and RELIABLE.
We offer both local and foreign news on animals, disability and the elderly.
PET+BLOGSPOT was first established in October 2007. Our hits since then are now 250,000 and ever increasing!
PET+BLOGSPOT is updated daily.
Kindly note that views expressed in PET+BLOGSPOT are not necessarily those of PETPOSITIVE.
You may also visit our Webpage by browsing: www.petpositive.org
You can also find us in Facebook under PETPOSITIVE EMPOWERMENT.
Please sign up as a FOLLOWER of this Blog if you haven't done so already in order to show us your kind support for our work. Thank you!
No comments:
Post a Comment