Whilst it is true that it was the owner's fault for allowing his dog to roam outside his home's compound, why did the council have to resort to such brutality to shoot the dog? And why did the Department of Veterinary Services agree to do it instead of catching the dog so that the owner could learn from his mistake, pay the fine and collect his dog? This is unacceptable. The council and DVS must explain.
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10155697283038535&id=635883534
No comments:
Post a Comment
PET+BLOGSPOT invites readers to to share their personal thoughts with us. We welcome bouquets as well as brickbats - as long as they are constructive and help us improve in our mission.
Please be responsible with your comments, considering the feelings and sensitivities of others. No insults, swear words, crude or sexual language or defamatory words will be tolerated. PET+BLOGSPOT reserves the right to remove comments that violate these principles.
NOTE: Views and comments expressed in these contents are those of our readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of PETPOSITIVE. Have a good day!